Opinion  

'Overlooking the impact of Cop28 would be a mistake'

Dan Kemp

Dan Kemp

As the global investment community turns its gaze toward Cop28 in Dubai, we confront the stark backdrop of our collective climate inaction.

This pivotal summit arrives amid global upheaval, where immediate crises from regional conflicts to economic turmoil in the wake of a pandemic vie for the world's attention.

Yet, for astute investors, the dialogues within Cop28's forums bear significant consequence, for therein lie catalysts capable of recalibrating the financial landscape. 

Article continues after advert

The convocation at Cop28 broaches 'finance' as a cornerstone theme, recognising that capital allocation is instrumental in realigning our trajectory towards the aspirational 1.5 per cent climate target.

The decisions and discussions that will crystallise into the conference's final edict are not merely environmental pledges, they are determinants of economic reorientation that could reconfigure the portfolios we steward. 

At what will inevitably be billed as one of the last chances to avert climate disaster, participants will struggle to attract the attention of a world focused on the horrific situation in the Middle East, ongoing war in eastern Europe and the economic challenges of a post-Covid world, all of which appear more urgent and tangible to those being discussed at Cop28. 

While it would be easy to overlook Cop this year, this would be a mistake from an investor’s perspective as this event has the potential for meaningful change that could impact the companies that comprise investor portfolios.

Finance is one of four cross-cutting themes for the conference, alongside technology and innovation, inclusion, and frontline communities, and consequently the allocation of capital to support a return to a 1.5 per cent trajectory is expected to key to the discussions and negotiations leading to the final conference text.

To navigate Cop28's potential reverberations through the marketplace, investors must adopt a discerning lens, tempering optimism with pragmatic foresight. It is incumbent upon us to eschew conflating our aspirational vision for the summit's outcomes with the pragmatic probabilities of actual events.

The realm of investing is governed by the probabilistic evaluation of various scenarios, not the least of which includes the seemingly intransigent path of inaction.

Nonetheless, we must also ascribe due weight to the less likely, yet pivotal, scenarios wherein Cop28 might indelibly impact global economic structures and, in turn, asset valuations.

Failure to take account of lower probability outcomes results in surprises, which in turn lead to the greatest and most predictable investing mistakes.

A precedent for such pivotal moments is the unexpected progress in establishing a loss and damage fund preceding Cop28 – progress that, while tangentially touching the investment community, underscores the potential for unforeseen advancements.  

Investors, in assessing the implications of Cop28, must remember that asset prices are influenced through three primary channels: cash flow alterations, volatility shifts, and investor sentiment.

For instance, an intensified agenda for the phasing out of fossil fuels may truncate cash flows to traditional energy sectors, reshaping the fundamental valuation of such enterprises.